Add vendoring
All checks were successful
Gitea Actions Demo / Explore-Gitea-Actions (push) Successful in 50s
All checks were successful
Gitea Actions Demo / Explore-Gitea-Actions (push) Successful in 50s
This commit is contained in:
76
vendor/github.com/valyala/fastrand/README.md
generated
vendored
Normal file
76
vendor/github.com/valyala/fastrand/README.md
generated
vendored
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
|
||||
[](https://travis-ci.org/valyala/fastrand)
|
||||
[](http://godoc.org/github.com/valyala/fastrand)
|
||||
[](https://goreportcard.com/report/github.com/valyala/fastrand)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# fastrand
|
||||
|
||||
Fast pseudorandom number generator.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# Features
|
||||
|
||||
- Optimized for speed.
|
||||
- Performance scales on multiple CPUs.
|
||||
|
||||
# How does it work?
|
||||
|
||||
It abuses [sync.Pool](https://golang.org/pkg/sync/#Pool) for maintaining
|
||||
"per-CPU" pseudorandom number generators.
|
||||
|
||||
TODO: firgure out how to use real per-CPU pseudorandom number generators.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# Benchmark results
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
$ GOMAXPROCS=1 go test -bench=. github.com/valyala/fastrand
|
||||
goos: linux
|
||||
goarch: amd64
|
||||
pkg: github.com/valyala/fastrand
|
||||
BenchmarkUint32n 50000000 29.7 ns/op
|
||||
BenchmarkRNGUint32n 200000000 6.50 ns/op
|
||||
BenchmarkRNGUint32nWithLock 100000000 21.5 ns/op
|
||||
BenchmarkMathRandInt31n 50000000 31.8 ns/op
|
||||
BenchmarkMathRandRNGInt31n 100000000 17.9 ns/op
|
||||
BenchmarkMathRandRNGInt31nWithLock 50000000 30.2 ns/op
|
||||
PASS
|
||||
ok github.com/valyala/fastrand 10.634s
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
$ GOMAXPROCS=2 go test -bench=. github.com/valyala/fastrand
|
||||
goos: linux
|
||||
goarch: amd64
|
||||
pkg: github.com/valyala/fastrand
|
||||
BenchmarkUint32n-2 100000000 17.6 ns/op
|
||||
BenchmarkRNGUint32n-2 500000000 3.36 ns/op
|
||||
BenchmarkRNGUint32nWithLock-2 50000000 32.0 ns/op
|
||||
BenchmarkMathRandInt31n-2 20000000 51.2 ns/op
|
||||
BenchmarkMathRandRNGInt31n-2 100000000 11.0 ns/op
|
||||
BenchmarkMathRandRNGInt31nWithLock-2 20000000 91.0 ns/op
|
||||
PASS
|
||||
ok github.com/valyala/fastrand 9.543s
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
$ GOMAXPROCS=4 go test -bench=. github.com/valyala/fastrand
|
||||
goos: linux
|
||||
goarch: amd64
|
||||
pkg: github.com/valyala/fastrand
|
||||
BenchmarkUint32n-4 100000000 14.2 ns/op
|
||||
BenchmarkRNGUint32n-4 500000000 3.30 ns/op
|
||||
BenchmarkRNGUint32nWithLock-4 20000000 88.7 ns/op
|
||||
BenchmarkMathRandInt31n-4 10000000 145 ns/op
|
||||
BenchmarkMathRandRNGInt31n-4 200000000 8.35 ns/op
|
||||
BenchmarkMathRandRNGInt31nWithLock-4 20000000 102 ns/op
|
||||
PASS
|
||||
ok github.com/valyala/fastrand 11.534s
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
As you can see, [fastrand.Uint32n](https://godoc.org/github.com/valyala/fastrand#Uint32n)
|
||||
scales on multiple CPUs, while [rand.Int31n](https://golang.org/pkg/math/rand/#Int31n)
|
||||
doesn't scale. Their performance is comparable on `GOMAXPROCS=1`,
|
||||
but `fastrand.Uint32n` runs 3x faster than `rand.Int31n` on `GOMAXPROCS=2`
|
||||
and 10x faster than `rand.Int31n` on `GOMAXPROCS=4`.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user